| Let me show you how I know. Not with my opinion, but with a study, and a big one at that. |
| Researchers at McMaster University and the Population Health Research Institute in Canada pulled together data on 8,783 adults between the ages of 35 and 69. None of them had any history of heart disease. Each one filled out a detailed food questionnaire, had their body fat measured, and then lay inside an MRI machine so the team could photograph the blood vessels of the brain. |
| They were looking for small areas of damage called vascular brain injury, which includes strokes so small the person never knew one had happened. That part you would expect. The part I did not expect is that the same people sat down on the same visit and took memory and thinking tests. |
| What they found |
| McMaster University and PHRI, 2026. de Souza et al., JAMA Network Open. |
| The scans (more injury at the top of the range) |
| Vascular brain injury appeared in 11.3 percent of the group eating the most ultra-processed food, against 8.1 percent of the group eating the least. Adjusted for age, income, smoking and the usual risk factors, that is 40 percent higher odds, and 78 percent higher among the women. The authors call that last comparison an unplanned one that other studies will need to confirm. |
| The memory and thinking tests (no difference) |
| Scores came out about the same across all four groups. Nobody in that room could feel what the scan was picking up, and nothing they noticed about themselves would have told them. |
| The scan picked up something the women could not feel, and the tests could not catch either. |
|
|
| In other words, the signal you were told to listen for was never there to hear. A scan could tell those groups apart. Memory and thinking tests could not, and neither could the women living in those bodies. |
| Your willpower had nothing to do with this. Neither did how closely you were paying attention. |
| So how does a box of cereal end up anywhere near the blood vessels of the brain? |
| Ultra-processed food is built for shelf life and speed, not for blood vessels. The people eating the most of it in this study also carried more body fat and more deep belly fat, and that kind of fat is linked to inflammation and to damage in small vessels. That is the pathway the researchers suspected, though they could not confirm it here, and the link to the scans held even after they accounted for body fat. What the authors did point to is simpler. The packaged food appeared to crowd out the whole food, so what was missing from the plate may matter as much as what was on it. |
| You never stood a chance of catching this on your own. Neither did I, and I read these papers for a living. Nothing in a mirror, a mood, or an energy level reports on the inside of a blood vessel. |
| That’s the part no one says out loud… the advice to listen to your body only works on the things your body talks about. And this was never one of them. |