| Let me show you how I know. Not with my opinion, but with the largest pile of evidence anyone has put together on this one question. |
| In 2015, a team at the University of Cambridge went through every trial they could find in which people were handed the same food in two different sizes. Same food, same room, same kind of people. The only thing changed was how big the portion, the package or the plate was. |
| Sixty-one of those trials met the standard for the main analysis, covering 6,711 people. Then the researchers pooled all of it and asked the question my mother never got asked… |
| What they found |
| Cochrane Review, 2015. Hollands et al., Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. |
| The larger size (they ate more) |
| People handed the bigger portion, package or plate ate more of it. The pattern held across 61 randomized trials and 6,711 participants, which is why the authors called it the most conclusive evidence on the question to date. |
| The smaller size (they ate less) |
| Same food, same people, less of it eaten. Nobody was told to cut back, and nobody was counting a thing. |
| The effect appeared regardless of gender, body mass index, how hungry people were, and how much self-control they had around food. |
|
|
| In other words, the size of the thing she was handed decided how much she ate, and self-control was not what separated the two groups. That bag in the hall was doing the work. |
| Her willpower had nothing to do with it. Yours doesn’t either. |
| So why does a bigger container get past a woman who can balance a payroll? |
| A package is the only measuring tool most of us ever use. When food arrives in a unit, the unit becomes the serving, because there is nothing else in the room telling you where the end is. The bag with the handle has no end written into it. It also costs less per ounce than the small one, and that is the part worth saying plainly: the size that is hardest to stop eating is the size the store rewards you for buying. |
| My mother never stood a chance in that hall. She was doing arithmetic against a bag that had none. Neither did you, I’d bet. |
| That’s the part no one says out loud… and the candy aisle this week is the clearest proof of it. NielsenIQ reported on Monday that small bags were the only size still growing, while the large and the extra large fell hardest. |